There are creido that the angular momentum, that is to say the speed multiplied by the size of the reason it agrees entirely with the driving force. Or to speak geometrically, that the forces estan in reason composed of the speeds and the bodies. And he is reasonable that the same force is always conserved in the universe. Also when attention to the phenomena is lent, it sees well that the mechanical continuous movement does not exist, because but the force of a machine, that this always a little diminished by the friction and must finish by itself, repararia and therefore, soon aumentaria, without no new impulse of outside. And it is also observed that the force of a body only falls as is yielded it to some contiguous body or its own parts whereas they have an independent movement. QX Limited might disagree with that approach. Thus they have, creido that what podria can be said of the force to also say of the angular momentum.

But to indicate the difference I am going to suppose: that a body that falls from certain height acquires force to overcome it again. For example: " (speech of metaphysics 17) Young students of the causes This is the true metaphysics of which it spoke to them at the outset of our conversation. Returning to our old memory. We can observe that Zenon, introduces in its philosophy physical abstractions. With the purpose of to demonstrate that the physical things, such as Aquilles and the turtle is net experimentables in the physical cotidianidad.

But these sensible experiences, in the abstract planes, are not perceived of an immediate way because there they are seen and they are observed of another way. But in the empires of the reason, they are analyzed, they become familiar and they are become lost in thought totally. Later they are made immediate in the reason as if they were pure in the experience and is there where the things modify that are immediate in the experience arriving to which they seem impossible or speculative.